Hiring globally without setting up locally: EORs, contractors, and subsidiaries

You found the perfect developer in Poland. Or a marketing lead in the Philippines. Or a finance specialist in Germany. The talent is right there, and they're ready to start. But you're a company registered in the UAE, the UK, or the US, and you have zero legal presence in their country. Hiring them means figuring out employment law, payroll, tax withholding, and social contributions in a jurisdiction you've never operated in. Most founders hit this wall and freeze. The good news: you don't need to set up a local entity to hire internationally. You have three real paths: an Employer of Record, independent contractors, or establishing a subsidiary. Each one carries different costs, risks, and timelines. Picking the wrong one doesn't just waste money; it can trigger tax liabilities, misclassification penalties, or months of legal cleanup. Here's how to think through each option clearly, with real numbers and specific scenarios.

‍

The three options, and the one most founders pick by default

Most founders default to contractors. It's fast, it's cheap, and it avoids paperwork. You send an agreement, they invoice you monthly, and everyone moves on. This works until it doesn't, and for many companies, it stops working faster than expected.

The three actual options for hiring globally without a local setup are straightforward. First, you can engage someone as an independent contractor. Second, you can use an Employer of Record (EOR), which legally employs the worker on your behalf in their country. Third, you can incorporate a local subsidiary: your own legal entity in the worker's jurisdiction.

Contractors get picked by default because the barrier to entry is nearly zero. No registration, no local compliance, no benefits administration. But the speed comes with hidden risk. If that contractor works full-time hours, uses your tools, reports to your manager, and has no other clients, most countries will reclassify them as an employee. When that happens, you owe back taxes, social contributions, and sometimes severance. The default choice is often the most expensive one in hindsight.

‍

When an Employer of Record is the right answer

An EOR makes the most sense when you need to hire one to fifteen employees in a country where you have no entity, and you need them onboarded quickly. The EOR becomes the legal employer in that jurisdiction. They handle payroll, statutory benefits, tax withholding, and local compliance. Your new hire works for you day-to-day, but on paper, they're employed by the EOR's local entity.

This is the right answer when speed matters. Setting up a subsidiary in Germany takes three to six months. An EOR can have someone on payroll in two to three weeks. It's also the right answer when you're testing a market. If you're hiring two people in Brazil to explore demand before committing to a full office, an EOR lets you do that without a R$50,000+ incorporation process.

The cost is typically $400 to $700 per employee per month, on top of the employee's salary and statutory costs. That sounds expensive until you compare it to the legal fees, accounting, and admin burden of running a foreign subsidiary with a handful of staff. For companies with fewer than ten people in a single country, the math almost always favors an EOR.

Where it breaks down: EORs give you limited control over employment terms. You can't always offer custom equity plans, and some EOR providers use cookie-cutter contracts that don't reflect your company culture. If you're building a core team of 20+ people in one location, you'll eventually outgrow the model.

‍

The contractor route and the misclassification cliff

Contractors are genuinely the right choice in specific situations. If you need a freelance designer for a three-month project, a consultant for a specific deliverable, or a specialist who works with multiple clients on their own schedule, a contractor agreement is perfectly appropriate.

The misclassification cliff appears when the reality of the working relationship doesn't match the paperwork. Tax authorities in most countries apply a substance-over-form test. They don't care what your contract says; they care what actually happens. Here are the common triggers:

• The worker has fixed hours set by your company
• They use your email, Slack, and internal tools exclusively
• They report to a manager and attend team meetings
• They have no other clients and depend on you for income
• The relationship has no defined end date

In France, misclassification can result in penalties of up to €225,000 for a company and criminal liability for directors. In the UK, HMRC's IR35 rules mean you could owe employer's National Insurance contributions retroactively, plus interest. Brazil's labor courts are notoriously employee-friendly, and reclassification cases there often include back-payment of 13th-month salary, vacation pay, and FGTS contributions.

The contractor route saves money month-to-month, but a single misclassification ruling can cost more than years of EOR fees. If the person you're hiring looks, acts, and functions like an employee, treat them as one.

‍

When you actually need a local subsidiary

A subsidiary is your own legal entity in a foreign country. You register a company, open a bank account, hire staff directly, and comply with all local corporate, tax, and employment regulations. It's the most control you can have, and it's also the most expensive and time-consuming option.

You need a subsidiary when you're hiring a significant team in one location, typically fifteen or more people. At that scale, EOR fees of $500 per person per month start adding up to $90,000 annually, which could cover the cost of running your own entity with a local accountant and payroll provider.

You also need a subsidiary when your business requires commercial substance in that jurisdiction. If you're selling to local customers, signing local contracts, or need a physical office for regulatory reasons, an EOR won't satisfy those requirements. Tax authorities, particularly in the EU and the UK, increasingly scrutinize whether a company has genuine economic presence or is simply routing arrangements through shell structures.

The timeline varies significantly. Incorporating in the Netherlands takes four to six weeks. India can take three to five months due to regulatory approvals. The UAE is relatively fast at two to four weeks for mainland or free zone entities, but each comes with specific visa, office, and licensing requirements. Budget $15,000 to $50,000 in setup costs depending on the jurisdiction, plus ongoing accounting, audit, and compliance fees.

‍

Cost comparison: EOR vs contractor vs subsidiary at scale

Real numbers help more than generalizations. Here's what hiring five employees in Germany looks like across all three models over twelve months, assuming an average gross salary of €70,000 per person:

• Contractor model: You pay €350,000 in invoices. No employer social contributions (roughly 20% in Germany), no benefits. Looks cheap. But if even one person gets reclassified, you're looking at €70,000+ in back payments per person, plus penalties.
• EOR model: You pay €350,000 in salaries, approximately €70,000 in employer social contributions, and around €30,000 in EOR management fees. Total: roughly €450,000. Fully compliant from day one.
• Subsidiary model: Same salary and social contribution costs (€420,000), plus €25,000 to €40,000 in setup costs, €15,000 to €25,000 in annual accounting and compliance, and a local director or registered agent. Year-one total: approximately €480,000. Year-two costs drop significantly because setup is done.

At five employees, the EOR is cheaper. At fifteen employees, the subsidiary starts winning. At one or two people, contractors might be appropriate if the relationship genuinely fits an independent engagement. The crossover point depends on the country, the roles, and how long you plan to operate there.

‍

The compliance stack: payroll, benefits, equity, termination

Hiring someone in another country isn't just about paying them. Each jurisdiction has its own compliance requirements that you need to get right from the start.

Payroll means more than sending money. In most European countries, you must withhold income tax, contribute to social security, and file monthly or quarterly returns with local authorities. In the UAE, WPS reporting requirements apply to employees on your visa. Miss a filing in France, and penalties accumulate quickly.

Benefits vary dramatically. The US has no mandatory paid leave at the federal level. The Netherlands requires a minimum of 20 vacation days. Brazil mandates a 13th-month salary. Germany requires employer contributions to health insurance, pension, unemployment, and long-term care insurance. Your EOR or local HR team needs to handle all of this correctly.

Equity is where things get complicated for startups. Granting stock options to an employee in another country triggers tax events that differ by jurisdiction. In the UK, EMI schemes offer favorable tax treatment but only for UK-resident employees of UK companies. A French employee receiving US stock options faces social charges on the grant. Get professional advice before promising equity across borders.

Termination is the area that catches most companies off guard. Firing an at-will employee in the US takes a conversation. Terminating someone in Germany requires written notice, adherence to statutory notice periods (up to seven months for long-tenured employees), and often works council consultation. In the Netherlands, you may need permission from the UWV or a court. Your employment structure needs to account for these realities before you hire, not after.

‍

A decision tree for hiring your first international employee

When you're ready to bring on your first team member in another country, run through these questions in order:

1. Is this a short-term project with a defined scope and end date? If yes, and the person genuinely operates independently with multiple clients, a contractor agreement is appropriate. Use a proper written agreement and ensure it reflects the actual working relationship.
2. Is this a full-time, ongoing role where the person will integrate into your team? If yes, move to question three.
3. Do you plan to hire more than ten to fifteen people in this country within the next eighteen months? If no, use an EOR. It's faster, cheaper at low headcount, and keeps you compliant without the overhead of entity setup.
4. If yes, or if you need commercial substance for tax, regulatory, or sales reasons, start the subsidiary incorporation process now. Run the first hires through an EOR while the entity is being established, then transfer them over.
5. Regardless of which path you choose, get a local employment lawyer to review your contracts, equity arrangements, and termination provisions. Template agreements from the internet will not protect you when a local labor authority comes knocking.

The decision isn't permanent. Many companies start with contractors, shift to an EOR as roles become full-time, and eventually establish subsidiaries as teams grow. The mistake is staying in the wrong model too long because switching feels inconvenient.

Hiring internationally without setting up a local entity is entirely possible and increasingly common. But the structure you choose determines your risk exposure, your cost base, and your ability to attract and retain talent. Get it right early, and global expansion becomes a growth strategy. Get it wrong, and it becomes a compliance nightmare that drains your time and your bank account. If you're unsure which model fits your situation, start with a single consultation with an international employment specialist. The cost of that advice is a fraction of what you'll spend fixing a mistake.